Thursday, February 24, 2011

Memorization Epiphany:

     I have mentioned learning types many times.  At the basest assessment, I am a kinesthetic learner meaning I learn from partaking in activity.  One of the things I read about was writing a rule out after you miss a question with it.   I have never attempted nor even thought possible for myself to memorize large volumes of material.  I thought I had to have familiarity and that would suffice.  Well, I have rethought this.

    I came across a post at All4jds.com., a website comprised of forums dealing with lawschool, bar exam, and lawyering related topics.  So, when of the posts was about how to increase memory.  A poster replied and posted a link to his company page http://lawprism.com/. Basically, he runs a california company and helps people prepare for the "California bar exam" and the "Baby bar."  He did this lecture, which you can access Here . It's two hours but definitely worth listening to. 
  
    Towards the end he talked about how he studied for the "Baby bar" or "First year law school exam" in California.  [For those who don't know, California allows people to go to California accredited lawschools for a year or 2 and take an examination which will give them a license to practice law in the State of California only.]  So, at the end he said he was down to 72 or so hours, If I remember correctly, and proceeded to type the rules out 15-20 times in order to achieve rote memorization of the necessary rules.  He didn't advocate this approach for the regular bar exam. 

   I was down to about 20 days.  I was panicking and I knew I had to memorize.  I stopped doing practice MBE questions and writing essays.  I picked up outlines and started to read them and repeat them to myself, because, although painstaking and not efficient, I didn't know what else to do.  I was able to memorize some things but the memory traces were not as strong as I knew I needed them to be to achieve success. 

   So, with about 10 days left, I came across that lecture, pro gratis, of course.  I listened to the whole thing.  It was a topic I had been researching for a while and it was of interest to me.  I began to employ that technique of typing everything out.

     I couldn't type everything.  First of all, there wasn't enough time at that point.  I had to make the best and most reasonable use of my time which is what any lawyer or aspiring attorney would be expected to do.  Second of all, it was'nt necessary.  For example, I am pretty certain U.C.C. Article 2 governs contracts for the sale of goods.  I could recite that rule in my sleep I have heard it so many times.  But that is me.  If I did not know it well and/or I needed to be reminded, I would write it out.  I focused on things that tended to trip me up, that had many elements, or that I really had issues recalling.  Also, certain things are not likely to be tested.  For example, a contract can be written or oral.  This is great to know.  It's important. However, without getting into statute of fraud issues or the "can of worms" it leads to, it is unlikely the bar exam will ask you a question calling for that stand alone statement.  It is the best example I can think of, but I hope you get the point.  Bar examiners don't and can't really test everything. 

   Additionally, I didn't write everything full out.  For example, I needed to learn the jurisdiction of the Florida courts.  I drafted it into an outline format like this:

  • FL Supreme Ct.
    • Mandatory
      • Death penalty
      • Bonds
      • Invalidation of State statutes or constitutional provisions
      • Statewide Utility rate decisions
    • Discretionary
      • Class of Constitutional officers
      • Conflicting decisions
      • Validation of State statutes or constitutional provisions
      • "Great public importance"cases
      • Federally Certified questions
      • Bypass certification
    • Writs
      • No Certiorari
Et cetera.  If it was a stand alone rule I needed to remember, sometimes I would write full sentences.  After doing this, I produced some of the best essays I have ever written.  Meanwhile, my multiple choice scores increased exponentially because I had the laws at the tips of my hands.  When I needed to recall something, If a wrote the first line, the rest would be triggered. 

        I used this to spit out some of the most specific, detailed, and concise rule statements I have ever written.  I used to think the rule statements in the Barbri outlines were impossible until I learned this technique.  I am not sure this is the best way.  But, it is far more better for me to do this than it is for me to read an outline and close my eyes hoping the words will magically appear in my mind.

      The obvious Caveat is, this might not work for everyone.  If it doesn't don't bother with it.  If it does, then more power to you.  Like anything else, it takes work and is not magic.  Sometimes it would take me 7-10 times before I could write something without having to refer to the source.  But, like clockwork, I was able to recall and rewrite the rule, statement, or outline I had copied by the 15th to 20th time nearly without fail. 

     Also, I don't really want to go into detail about it in this post, and probably not on this blog for that matter.  But, a tip to strengthen the memory trace in addition to writing, is to speak what is being written, and to read what you just wrote as well.  To put it simply, when we store something into memory we create a pathway in the brain to do it.  If a person writes, this creates one pathway.  These pathways can break if they are not strong and this is what causes difficulty retrieving memories when they are absolutely needed. This could be the result of increased stress (such as when taking exams) or other emotional scenarios.  However, if a person writes, reads aloud, and visualizes the same information, the memory trace is much stronger.  This means, the memory will be easier to retrieve.

      I will post some more about this later on.

The "Reverse Perfect Score"

      I stayed with two friends of mine this time.  It was great to see them, but of course we all wished it wasn't under these circumstances.  Nonetheless, when we get together, we reminisce of course and talk about how our other acquaintences and friends are doing. These two guys, are pretty funny and we all keep it "light" while we shoot the breeze.

    So we were talking about a friend of ours called Stan.  When Stan's name came up one friend and I asked about him and how he faired on the exam.  My other friend replied, "Stan got a perfect score."  The former friend and I replied "perfect score?"  So, the second freind went on to explain.

     Stan received a 136 on the state portion and a 136 on the MBE, and aggregate of 272 for a combined 136 average.  This was not a point more nor a point less than what was precisely needed to pass.  According to my friend's logic, Stan did precisely the amount of work necessary.  He further elaborated about people that score 150s or higher and how those scores reflect a person who has wasted 10-20 days of their life studying while they could have been doing something more "worthwhile."  He concluded by saying: "Stan got the Reverse perfect Score."

     We all cracked up about this.  That's not really how I operate, but for my friend who explained this comment I understand his point of view.  He is gifted student, who, while failing the first attempt at the Florida Bar examination, only committed about 20 or so hours of work to it.  He only failed by 1 point.  In comparison, I spent at least 100 hours (and probably way more) studying for that test and I failed by 6 points.  This is a guy who, even now, is apportioning his time by completing an L.L.M. at a tier 1 Tax L.L.M. program. He was about the same in Law School.  He would pull off amazing grades with "Reverse Perfect" effort, so to speak.

     I do not buy into this theory at all.  I come hard, or I don't come at all.  "Something worth doing, is worth doing well."  Overpreparation is possible, but not for something like the bar for what my opinion is worth.  Anyway, that is the "reverse perfect score."

    

    
  

  

Back again. Yay

      What's up world? It's been a while.  I am home after taking the Bar again for the 3rd time.  Hopefully it was the last time.  Taking the bar is expensive business especially in Florida.  There is only one testing site unlike most other states.  So, unless you live near tampa you will have to stay in a hotel and travel to and from Tampa and depending on where you go, it could get costly.

      Well, I don't want to convolute the posts and mix things up.  I have plenty I would like to say, so I will do it in installments.